cronbach

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES : Cronbach 's α coefficient was used to test internal consistency reliability ;

主要观察指标Cronbach'sα系数检验问卷的内部一致性信度；

The whole scale had good consistency reliability and the Cronbach a coefficient is . 9445 .

第二，总量表具有良好的同质性信度，整份问卷的Cronbachα系数达到.9445。

The reliability of internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach 's alpha coefficients ;

用克朗巴赫系数α（Cronbach'salpha）用来评价条目间的内部一致性信度；

Chapter 4 analyses the data by factors and correlation analysis , tests construct validity and Cronbach 's a coefficients .

第四章整理和分析问卷数据，量表的一般构思效度和信度的检验，对模型和研究假说进行了验证和分析。

Methods : The cronbach - α coefficient , fixed effect model and mixed effect model were used to test the reliability of occupational stress survey .

方法：信度估计采用了同质性的cronbach-α系数以及固定与混合效应模型。

Cronbach 's α was 0.81 and 0.72 , respectively .

量表的同质性系数分别为0.81和0.72。

Factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity . [ Results ] Cronbach ' α coefficient of SF-8 was 0.749 ;

[结果]SF-8量表的克朗巴赫α系数为0.749；

Test-retest reliability and internal concordance coefficient ( Cronbach a coefficient ) were used to test reliability of the questionnaire .

本研究用重测信度和内部一致性系数（Cronbachα系数）检验问卷的信度。

The reliability analysis included the Cronbach 's a , split-half reliability . The validity analysis included content , construct , and difference validity .

选用Cronbach'sa系数、分半系数检验量表的信度，效度检验主要包括内容效度、结构效度和区分效度检验。

The reliability coefficient of the C-testing was computed by Cronbach 's alpha .

完字填空题的信度以Cronbach的系数计算。

By cronbach alpha and confirmatory factor analysis , we test the reliability and validity of the scale , and the result of test is good .

运用和验证性因子分析进行检验表明，本研究量表具有良好的信度与效度，因此可以对量表收集的相关数据进行统计分析。

Results Cronbach 's alpha coefficients in normal group are higher than 0.7 . The discriminatory validity in anxiety and close dependence dimension is good .

结果Cronbachα系数亲近、焦虑两个分量表均在0.7以上，依赖为0.6202。区分效度焦虑和亲近依赖均有良好的区分效度。

The Cronbach alpha coefficients of the whole scale and 3 subscales were 0.869 9 , 0.88 , 0.69 and 0.77 respectively .

总量表及各分量表的Cronbachα系数分别为：0.8699，身心衰竭0.88，人格解体0.69，缺乏成就感0.77。

Cronbach Alpha was 0.83 and acquired index related to general satisfactory rate and satisfactory rate of each item was 0.47 ~ 0.79 ( P < 0.01 ) .

测得的总体满意度与各服务项目满意度的相关系数为0.47～0.79，P<0.001。

Internal concordance coefficient ( Cronbach a coefficient ) split-half coefficient , and test-retest reliability were analyzed to verify the reliability of the questionnaire .

修订的《工作倾向问卷》具有较好的信度和效度。本研究采用内部一致性系数（Cronbachα系数）、分半信度和重测信度检验问卷的信度。

The reliability analysis included the mean inter-item correlation , Cronbach 's a coefficient , split-half reliability , test-retest reliability and the generalizability analysis .

选用项目间平均相关系数、Cronbach'sα系数、分半相关系数和重测相关系数以及概化系数检验量表的信度；效度检验主要包括内容效度、结构效度和实证效度。

Results : The scale has good reliability and construct validity , the Cronbach α is 0.8541 . Confirmatory factor shows good fit between the data and the construct of scale .

结果：大学新生强迫症状调查问卷有较好的内在信度和结构效度，总量表的克隆巴赫α系数为0.8541，验证性因素分析表明测量数据与量表结构拟合良好。

Methods The reliability was evaluated with Cronbach alpha and Guttman Split-half , the construct and content validity of the questionnaire was evaluated with factor analysis .

方法通过分析克朗巴赫系数α、分半信度和表面效度、结构效度，评价调查问卷的信度和效度。

The reliability of all the questionnaires used in this paper was calculated by Cronbach coefficient , and the result showed that the reliability coefficients of the questionnaires were all acceptable .

并对所用的调查问卷进行了信度计算，计算结果表明，所使用的三份调查问卷的信度都在可接受范围内。

Furthermore , combined the example , the paper has progressed the practice analysis . Cronbach a coefficient and Kendall coefficient of concordance are chosen to evaluate the evaluation reliability .

结合具体实例，进行了实践分析验证，并且对评价结果应用Cronbachα系数和Kendall和谐系数进行了信度分析和一致性检验。

Cronbach Alpha was0.876 , split-half reliability coefficient was0.841 .

问卷的同质性信度系数为0.876，分半信度系数为0.841。

Cronbach 's alpha coefficient of compositive index for A type behavior was 0.55 . Conclusion The Kappa index and alpha coefficient were both inherently population-specific .

A型行为综合指标的克朗巴哈α系数为0.552。

Result The split-half reliability of the scales was 0.95 , and all of the Cronbach α coefficients were above 0.7 . A physical factor and a psychological factor were identified by factor analysis .

结果SF-36量表分半信度0.95，各维度及总表的Cronbachα系数均大于0.7。因子分析产生2个公因子，分别代表生理和心理方面。

Method : 146 first-episode schizophrenic patients were evaluated with BPRS before and after treatment , then 18 items of BPRS were conducted factor analysis , item analysis and computed Cronbach alpha .

方法：对首发精神分裂症患者在治疗前后分别评定BPRS，然后对其18个项目进行因子分析、项目分析和计算Cronbachα值。

The result shows that cronbach alpha coefficient of POMS-R is 0.9 ; factor analysis with varimax rotation extracted a seven-factor solution accounting for 58.1 % of the variance .

结果表明：POMS-R的CronbachAlpha系数是0.9，因子分析析出7个因子，累计贡献率58.1%。

Results : First , evaluated the internal consistent reliability of the inventories ( OSI-R and TABP ) by Cronbach α coefficient , and the result show they all have good internal consistent .

研究结果：首先采用Cronbachα系数对OSI-R和TABP两问卷进行了同质性信度检验，结果表明两量表的内部一致性较好。

Results : All psychometric indices of the revised PSPS were satisfactory ( the Cronbach α index for the three subscales were 0.742 , 0.705 and 0.681 ) .

结果：项目分析之后的15题PSPS的各项指标符合心理测量学要求（克伦巴赫α系数分别为0.742、0.705和0.681）。

Rating reliability was all calculated by Cronbach coefficient and the rating difference was tested by ANOVA to make sure the scores can reflect the test takers ' real translation competence as much as possible .

所有的评分都用克伦巴赫信度系数计算了评分信度，用ANOVA检验了评分员评分间的差异性，以确保评分尽可能近似地反映出考生的真实成绩。

The revised scale was administrated to 210 high school students to examine reliability and validity , showing that the Cronbach coefficient was 0.782 , retest reliability is 0.912 , and validity was 0.862 .

结果显示该量表的内部一致性系数为0.782，重测信度为0.912，效度为0.862。

Cronbach ′ s α was 0.90 and split-half reliability was 0.93 in the satisfaction questionnaire , and the cumulating contribution rate of the three common factors whose feature value > 1 was 58.2 % .

满意度问卷的Cronbach′sα系数为0.90、折半信度为0.93、特征值>1的公因子有3个，累积贡献率为58.2%。