普罗泰戈拉

本文将论证普罗泰戈拉和苏格拉底的冲突是一场根基于对知识的不同理解而产生的冲突，对普罗泰戈拉和苏格拉底的知识进行清理；

On this paper I will prove the conflicts between Protagoras and Socrates are based on the foundation of the different understanding for knowledge ;

人的主体地位的首次确立&普罗泰戈拉的名言“人是万物的尺度”阐释

First establishment of the subject position of human Being-Explanation of protagoras 's well-known saying " human being is the yardstick of all things on earth "

在西方，古希腊哲学家苏格拉底最早研究人是什么，普罗泰戈拉的至理名言人是万物的尺度虽历经千年而经久不衰。

In the west , Socrates researched into what is human earliest .

人是万物的尺度&普罗泰戈拉。

Man is the measure of all things-Protagoras .

普罗泰戈拉的论点，如果加以正当的解释，并不包含着一种见解说我永远不犯错误，而只是说我错误的证据必须向我呈现出来。

The Protagorean position , rightly interpreted , does not involve the view that I never make mistakes , but only that the evidence of my mistakes must appear to me .

主体性原则是西方传统哲学的一个基本原则，这一原则萌芽于古希腊哲学，尤其是普罗泰戈拉和苏格拉底的思想。

The principle of subjectivity plays the role of a fundamental principle in traditional western philosophy . It originates in classic Greek philosophy , particularly the thought of Protagoras and Socrates .

在西方，最早可以追溯到古希腊时期，普罗泰戈拉就曾提出：“人是万物的尺度”。

In the west , it can be dated back to as early as ancient Greek times , when Protagoras originally put forward : " human is the yardstick of everything " .

这一点我想是因为柏拉图在《泰阿泰德篇》里提示过（作为对普罗泰戈拉的一种解释），一种意见可能比另一种意见更好一些，但不一定是更真一些。

This was , I think , because Plato , in the Theaetetus , suggests , as aninterpretation of Protagoras , that one opinion can be better than another , though it cannot be truer .