共同侵权行为

第二部分，从共同侵权行为概念的外延和内涵两个方面分析。

The second part analyzes the extension and intension of joint act of tort concept .

论准共同侵权行为

On the Quasi Joint Act of Tort

浅论环境共同侵权行为的构成要件及实现机制

On the factors and realization system of the environmental infringement action

浅析共同侵权行为认定中的几个特殊问题

Analysis of Some Special Problems About Identification of Joint Tort

因此，研究共同侵权行为就显得十分必要。

So it is very necessary to research joint torts .

共同侵权行为人对受害人的连带赔偿责任

The Joint Indemnity of the Co-Tortfeasors to the Aggrieved Parties

共同侵权行为制度若干问题研究

Research on Several Issues of the Joint Tort System

第三部分阐述共同侵权行为与损害结果的因果关系。

The third part describes the results of joint tort causation and damage .

共同侵权行为的法理基础和类型化分析

The Jurisprudential Basis of the Tortious Conduct in Common and Analysis of Categorization

学界对共同侵权行为的构成要件尚无明确、统一的定论。

Academic violations of the constituent elements together are not clear , unified conclusion .

共同侵权行为构成理论的发展，是随归责原则的发展变化而来。

Common violations constitute a theoretical development is the evolution of attribution principles come .

共同侵权行为及其责任的侵权责任法立法抉择

The Legislative Choice of Tort Law about the Joint Act of Tort and its Liability

狭义的共同侵权行为包括共同故意的共同侵权行为和共同过失的共同侵权行为两种。

The narrow sense of joint torts includes conspire joint torts and joint fault joint torts .

四日市的诉讼判例第一次在审判中运用了共同侵权行为原则。

In Yokkaichi case , the principle of joint tort was applied for the first time .

第三部分对共同侵权行为的构成要件作类型化划分。

Part III mainly states the classification of the joint tort in terms of constructive elements .

共同侵权行为有关问题浅议

Study on joint tort

论共同侵权行为的类型

Category of Joint Tort

但在判断无意思联络数人侵权致同一损害结果时，应以损害是否可分作为认定共同侵权行为的标准。

But whether the damage made by persons without contract meaning can be divided should be the standard for affirmation .

共同侵权行为产生连带责任，其基础在于共同过错和共同行为的结合。

Joint act of tort incurs joint and several liability based on the combination of joint offence and joint act .

想要构建共同侵权行为的类型化体系，首先要弄清侵权行为的本质问题。

If you want to build a system of common violations , you must first understand the nature of joint tort .

对无意思联络的数人侵权的认识，直接影响对共同侵权行为的明确界定，这种重要的相关性也体现在民法典草案与侵权行为法学者建议稿中。

The understanding of the joint tort directly determines the recognition of the tort committed by several persons without meaning connection .

基于这些特性共同侵权行为只能适用连带责任制度作为赔偿制度。

Based on these characteristics , joint tort which are only the application of the joint liability as the compensation system .

由于法律和相关司法解释对共同侵权行为的类型化规存在一定问题，因此笔者试图对此加以分析并提出自己的见解。

Because there are many unreasonable requirements on the type of joint tort , so I try to analyze and improve it .

同时，共同侵权行为的行为主体一般由自然人构成，但并不限于自然人。

Meanwhile , the common violations of the actors generally constituted by a natural person , but not limited to natural persons .

共同侵权行为的类型化是指对共同侵权行为复杂的形态予以归类划分的方法。

Common type of tort is a tort refers to a common form of the complex to be classified into the method .

具体而言，本文内容分为以下三章：第一章，共同侵权行为主体构成要件。

Specifically , this paper can be divided into the following chapters : The first chapter , the main constituent elements common violations .

在责任承担部分中，本文根据共同侵权行为的不同类型使侵权人承担相应的责任并说明承担该种责任的理论基础。

The article make the infringer honor appropriate liability and explain its theory foundation according to different types of joint infringe on honoring liability .

本文就此问题展开分析研究，以期为正在进行的民法典起草和相关的司法解释提供有益的参考意见，逐步完善我国关于共同侵权行为的相关立法。

This essay analyzes above issues and provides some reference opinions to improvements of civil law and related legislation of joint act of tort .

同时其侵权形态的分类及连带责任制度的设立也是共同侵权行为最主要的特征。

Also the infringing forms of the classification and the establishment of joint liability system is the most important features of the joint tort .

本文的重点部分在于共同侵权行为本质的界定和共同侵权行为的认定。

The key part of this dissertation is on how to define the nature of joint tort and how to identify the joint tort .