执行异议之诉

试论执行异议之诉的程序构造

The Process Structure of the Law Suit with Carrying-out Dissidence

第三部分对执行异议之诉进行了比较研究。

The third part is about comparative legal cultures studies .

首先阐述了执行异议之诉的概念、特征以及分类。

Firstly , it describes concepts , characteristics and classifications of implementation of Objection .

浅议注册会计师对舞弊的甄别论民事执行异议之诉

Discussions on the Discrimination of Fraud by CPA

就理论基础而言，作者认为，执行异议之诉存在的基础其实可以溯源至诉讼程序中。

The theory base of the lawsuit of the enforcement trace to source the civil trial .

因此，我国的执行异议之诉制度有待于我们进一步地完善。

Therefore , my objection to the appeal system implementation we need to be further improved .

第一部分论证了执行异议之诉制度存在的基础。

In the first part of this treatise , the author argue the base of the lawsuit of the en for cement .

其次，结合学术界的各种学说，评析了执行异议之诉的法律性质。

Secondly , combined with a variety of academic theories , the article analyzes the legal nature of the lawsuit of enforcement .

然而，我国执行异议之诉制度设计尚存在不少缺陷，在立法上和司法实践中也存有诸多问题，仍需进一步完善。

However , the system for the lawsuit of enforcement in China is still not perfect . There are many problems to improve in the legislation and judicial practice .

根据《民事诉讼法》第二百零四条规定，提起执行异议之诉的期限为自执行裁定送达之日起十五日。

According to " Civil Law " Article 204 stipulates that the complaint filed objections to the implementation period for the implementation of the decision from the date of service of 15 .

民事执行异议之诉是民事执行救济中的一项重要内容和方法，它是通过诉的方式对执行当事人和第三人所进行的救济。

Civil lawsuit of objection to execution is one of the most important ways of remedies of civil execution . It is a remedy to the parties of execution and third party by lawsuit .

综观英美法系与大陆法系相关国家和地区有关第三人执行异议之诉的规定，因受各国的立法体例、文化传统等诸多因素的影响，呈现出多样化的形态。

Overview the provisions of the third party objection v. in Common Law and Civil Law countries or regions appear morphological diversity because of the legislative style , cultural traditions in different country and many other factors .

在此基础上分析指出我国修改前后的《民事诉讼法》关于案外人执行异议之诉制度规定的进步方面以及缺陷和不足。

Based on this analysis points out the changes before and after the " Civil Procedure Act " on the outsider raises objection to the appeal system requires the implementation progress as well as defects and deficiencies .

特别是我国民事执行异议之诉制度的创设，将非诉形式的执行异议程序性救济修改为由执行机构初步审查，再通过诉讼形式予以救济。

Especially , with the initial establishment of the system for the lawsuit of civil enforcement in China , the original procedural relief system of non-litigation forms has been replaced by the substantive relief system of action forms .

进而对案外人执行异议之诉制度的构建进行深入探讨并提出了切实可行的建议，以期科学合理地构建我国的案外人执行异议之诉制度。

Then the implementation of the outsider raises objection v. System in-depth study and put forward practical proposals to build a scientific and rational manner the implementation of our lawsuit about outsiders ' dissidence to civil execution system .

首先，介绍了民事执行异议之诉的概念及种类，论述了执行异议之诉的特征，明确其是执行程序中的实体性权利救济方式。

Firstly , the article introduces the concept and species of the lawsuit of civil enforcement , discusses the characteristics of the lawsuit of enforcement and clears it is a relief of substantive right in the enforcement procedure .

案外人执行异议之诉与普通的民事诉讼之所以不同，主要体现在诉讼的形成原因和终极目的、诉争标的物的状态等方面。

Third Party objection complaint with the implementation of general civil litigation is distinctive , mainly reflected in the proceedings of the causes and the ultimate objective , v. state of war and other aspects of the subject matter .

本文的重点在于审查案外人执行异议之诉的审判难点及其现阶段的解决办法，文章分别从实体法意义上和程序法意义上作以分析。

This article focuses on the Third Party Review of the implementation of objection and appeal of the trial difficult solution at this stage , articles were from the sense of substantive law and procedural law to make sense to analyze .

近两年来，执行异议之诉已逐渐成为审判实务中一类有相当数量的新类型案件，从立案到审理、从审理到调整执行程序，各个层面均出现了很多新问题。

The past two years , opposition to execution v. trial practice a considerable number of new types of cases from filing to hearing from the trial to adjust the program execution at all levels are a lot of new problems .

通过比较其与再审之诉、第三人执行异议之诉、第三人参加之诉等相关制度的不同，明晰第三人撤销之诉与其他相关制度的界限，明确其本质属性。

By comparing it with the retrial proceeding , the third person execution objection lawsuit , and the third person to participate in the lawsuit system , clear the boundary of it and the other related system , and clear its essence attribute .

在程序上，例举司法实践中各地法院对案外人执行异议之诉的不同审理方式，而对争议标的的权属是否做出判断也成为各地法院争议最为争议之处。

In the process , the examples of judicial practice in courts throughout the implementation of the Third Party objection hearing complaints of different ways , and whether the disputed ownership of the subject judge has become the most controversial parts of the court controversy .

具体救济手段按照程序上的救济和实体上的救济进行划分，建立执行抗告和异议之诉制度，从而为救济请求人提供及时、全面、有效的保护。

The relief methods should be classified into process relief and substantial relief , establish execution counterappeal and demurrer system so that it can provide comprehensive and effective protection in time for those relief claimers .

并且，无论在理论上还是执行立法中，对案外人执行异议之诉的基本理论问题和具体审理程序中的细节问题，都没有形成统一、明确的见解及规定。

And , both in theory and implementation of the legislation , the implementation of the outsider raises objection to the appeal of the basic theoretical issues and specific details of trial procedures , are not unified , clear ideas and regulations .

在该部分，笔者的结论是：不可避免的不当执行行为是设置第三人执行异议之诉的事实基础。

My conclusion is that the unavoidable improper enforcement act constitutes the factual base of the opposition lawsuit of the third person .

从分析我国执行异议的法律依据、存在问题入手，提出构建执行异议之诉的设想，并对执行异议之诉的当事人、法律后果、反诉、诉讼时效、调解和解等问题进行理论上的阐述。

This paper analyzes the legal bases of the existing problems in China 's opposition to execution , and theoretically expatiates upon the agents concerned , legal consequences , countercharge , prescription of lawsuit , mediation and compromise , etc. in opposition-to-execution charge .

在对执行救济制度的程序价值全面认识之后，应科学合理地构建我国的民事执行异议之诉制度，对债务人或第三人的实体权利给予全面的保护。

Having a comprehensive understanding of its procedural value , we should establish the system of lawsuit against the execution scientifically and reasonably to protect the debtor or the third party 's substantive rights .